Bans age discrimination in the provision of goods and service.Gives public bodies a 'duty' to target services, including health and education, at those from working class backgrounds.They warned it would burden firms struggling to cope with the worst recession in 60 years with more red tape and leave them open to 'costly and damaging' exployment tribunals.Ĭritics also hit out at proposals to force employers to reveal how much they paid men compared with women, saying it could hinder job creation. Incidence rates for cervical cancer in the UK are highest in females aged 30 to 34 (2015-2017).But the Equality Bill, which brings together nine major laws, yesterday prompted grave concern that white men could miss out unfairly on jobs.īusiness chiefs and opposition MPs reacted furiously to the plans, which have been described as 'socialism in one clause'. In females in the UK, cervical cancer is the 14th most common cancer, with around 3,100 new cases in 2017.Ĭervical cancer accounts for 2% of all new cancer cases in females in the UK (2017).Ĭervical cancer accounts for less than 1% of all new cancer cases in females and males combined in the UK (2017). There are around 3,200 new cervical cancer cases in the UK every year, that's more than 8 every day (2015-2017). In males in the UK, head and neck cancer is the 4th most common cancer, with around 8,500 new cases in 2017. In females in the UK, head and neck cancer is the 13th most common cancer, with around 3,800 new cases in 2017. Head and neck cancer is the 8th most common cancer in the UK, accounting for 3% of all new cancer cases (2017). There are around 12,200 new head and neck cancer cases in the UK every year, that's 34 every day (2015-2017). Note head and neck cancer, has less link to HPV than cervical cancer (as far as I am aware) It doesnt matter if men or women are in power, they will always look after women and children (girls mainly) first. This also serves as a case of gynocentriscim. feminists would write thousands of articles, the usual Guardian would be on it. if they only chose to vaccinate boys, they political outcry would have been so huge as well as claims of men doing laws for men etc.

However, politicians and medical drs are not stupid. This means they are at risk of penile and anal cancer far more than lesbians Also gay men have penetetrive sex with their penis which is far far more likely to give STIs than female lesbian sex. In fact, if you were to ONLY pick one gender it would make much more sense to pick boys, since oral sex between men is FAR FAR more likely to lead to STIs that female oral sex due to the penis being inserted deep into the mouth. This exact same logic could be applied to only vaccinting boys and not girls. Now the arguement was that if girls were vaccinated boys would be covered too via herd immunity. In the UK the HPV vaccination was only offered to girls and not boys. And I think most MRAs would agree with that.Īs a result, I wonder if the MRM is attacked simply because the idea of literal gender equality seems sexist to a lot of people. But I still think that pure 'equality of opportunity' style equality would be much better than the one sided gender equality that we have today. I believe in a certain amount of fairness where it is warranted, since men and women are in fact different (and that 'fairness' doesn't have to always benefit women, either). Personally I don't think that 'literal equality' is necessary. But it stands to reason that any kind of movement advocating for the literal equality of men and women may be seen as sexist in the eyes of a lot of people. Now I don't know if this is cultural or biological. In this study, it was found that when women aren't treated better then men, people see it is as unfair and sexist towards women. Lay misperceptions of the relationship between men’s benevolent and hostile sexism.

Are women given preferential treatment